5.23.2005
Our Friendly Neighborhood Latin Americanists
Juan Forero and Larry Rohter both have articles today in the NYTimes, on Bolivia and Chile, respectively.
Forero gives a good summary/recap of what's going on in Bolivia in terms of the latest round of social movements, which have mobilized in protest of the new hydrocarbons law. I think the article does a good job in illustrating that the debate in Bolivia is being framed today such that the uneducated populace becomes drawn to social movements which place the blame for the country's ills squarely on the shoulders of corrupt politicians and the transnationals. In the end, no one wins because the end result is a weak law that neither maximizes Bolivia's potential for gas exports nor does it quell the desires of private sector or social movements. Mesa continues to govern by not taking a stand. Many working-class Bolivians I spoke to recently either were firmly against the constant roadblocking and protesting ("We need to get a Pinochet in here to clean up the streets and put people to work") or expressed blunt hatred of the "corrupt" politicians who bring in foreign investment just so they can fill up their own coffers. ("Goni was corrupt and stole from the Bolivian people")
I agree with Boz that Rohter's article on the tragedy in Chile has nothing to do with Pinochet's legacy. A natural disaster is an unpredictable tragedy that cannot be tied to the abuses of a military government. However, those in the chain of command that apparently disregarded weather reports and sent ill-equipped soldiers into the fray should be punished, even if it was not their fault. An example of this sort of accountability: an American working at the US Embassy in Bogota told me that the general in command of the American soldiers caught selling ammunition to paramilitaries will be relieved of his command.
Bob Herbert argues the same today in his op-ed, saying that it's finally time for Secretary Rumsfeld to go. As a fellow Cap member and sprint football captain, I have always admired Rummy's intensity even if I usually disagreed with his politics. In any event, relieving Rumsfeld of his duties would be a wise move politically for the Bush administration by infusing new leadership into the Pentagon for the myriad challenges that lie ahead.
Forero gives a good summary/recap of what's going on in Bolivia in terms of the latest round of social movements, which have mobilized in protest of the new hydrocarbons law. I think the article does a good job in illustrating that the debate in Bolivia is being framed today such that the uneducated populace becomes drawn to social movements which place the blame for the country's ills squarely on the shoulders of corrupt politicians and the transnationals. In the end, no one wins because the end result is a weak law that neither maximizes Bolivia's potential for gas exports nor does it quell the desires of private sector or social movements. Mesa continues to govern by not taking a stand. Many working-class Bolivians I spoke to recently either were firmly against the constant roadblocking and protesting ("We need to get a Pinochet in here to clean up the streets and put people to work") or expressed blunt hatred of the "corrupt" politicians who bring in foreign investment just so they can fill up their own coffers. ("Goni was corrupt and stole from the Bolivian people")
I agree with Boz that Rohter's article on the tragedy in Chile has nothing to do with Pinochet's legacy. A natural disaster is an unpredictable tragedy that cannot be tied to the abuses of a military government. However, those in the chain of command that apparently disregarded weather reports and sent ill-equipped soldiers into the fray should be punished, even if it was not their fault. An example of this sort of accountability: an American working at the US Embassy in Bogota told me that the general in command of the American soldiers caught selling ammunition to paramilitaries will be relieved of his command.
Bob Herbert argues the same today in his op-ed, saying that it's finally time for Secretary Rumsfeld to go. As a fellow Cap member and sprint football captain, I have always admired Rummy's intensity even if I usually disagreed with his politics. In any event, relieving Rumsfeld of his duties would be a wise move politically for the Bush administration by infusing new leadership into the Pentagon for the myriad challenges that lie ahead.
# posted by Juanson : 4:52 PM
Comments:
<< Home
Does Rummy not have enough experience or is he just over the hill? I think that he should stay in power and get the job done. There is a reason that President Bush put Rummy there. There's a reason why Rummy has stayed there. We are making great strides and soon we will see success. Oh, one thing that seemed to be left out. If the election had been held in the military, do you know what the outcome would have been? Almost 100% of the vote would have gone to Bush. That's interesting.
# posted by 
: 11:37 AM
: 11:37 AM
Juan Forero's article is a good one. It is a sad situation and looks like Boliva's best bet is to let foreign investors in and reap the profits at a time when energy prices are skyrocketing. I also agree with both you and Boz regarding Rohter's article that it was a the natural disaster, not Pinochet’s legacy at fault here. However, you write, "those in the chain of command that apparently disregarded weather reports and sent ill-equipped soldiers into the fray should be punished, even if it was not their fault."
If those in the chain of command disregarded weather reports and sent ill-eqipped soliders into the fray, then how is it not their fault? They should be punished, absolutely.
If those in the chain of command disregarded weather reports and sent ill-eqipped soliders into the fray, then how is it not their fault? They should be punished, absolutely.
# posted by : 12:02 PM
: 12:02 PM
i gotta hand it to you, Anonymous, it is really quite frustrating to read your posts, but i can't resist.
on what facts do you base your claim that the military vote did/could have gone completely to Bush?!! Having spoken with numerous members of the military I am relatively certain that not all of them would have voted for Bush.
In fact I suspect the vote was probably 2-1 for Bush (not because they love him, but because Kerry came across as weak), but you can bet that guys without body armor or riding in ramshackle Humvees while they wrote letters to their wives telling them not to worry about the fact that they can't pay their bills, and they haven't seen their newborn son, and that, oh by the way, my tour might be extended AGAIN,...yeah, I bet some of those guys probably didn't vote for Bush.
on what facts do you base your claim that the military vote did/could have gone completely to Bush?!! Having spoken with numerous members of the military I am relatively certain that not all of them would have voted for Bush.
In fact I suspect the vote was probably 2-1 for Bush (not because they love him, but because Kerry came across as weak), but you can bet that guys without body armor or riding in ramshackle Humvees while they wrote letters to their wives telling them not to worry about the fact that they can't pay their bills, and they haven't seen their newborn son, and that, oh by the way, my tour might be extended AGAIN,...yeah, I bet some of those guys probably didn't vote for Bush.
# posted by : 1:17 PM
: 1:17 PM
The polling data I personally have comes from first-hand and second-hand encounters with those in the hospital at Walter Reed, actually. Most of those people have lost limbs; some have lost their sight and can't wait to get back there as fast as they can and prolong their duty as much as possible. But, their minds are probably being controlled by the “VRC” I'm sure. The polling data also comes from family and friends who are members of the Navy, Marines, and Air Force overseas. If you want to look at actual polling data that was released, I am sure you can find some around, for example, USA Today has one posted. I guess we were both wrong according to USA Today – it’s 4-1, not 4-0 or 2-1. I would be interested to see where you got your data though. Are these members of the military the same ones that wrote Kerry to not vote for the 87 billion? Or were they too upset about the fact that the 87 billion was seven times what we spend on education to ask for any more than what had already been provided? Those guys probably didn't even bother voting, since most of the population in this country doesn't anyway and I wish we could be more like Afghanistan in that category (80%). Something more interesting might be that a higher percentage of Arab-American voters supported Bush.
# posted by : 3:21 PM
: 3:21 PM
Anon,
I know that there is a reason that Bush put Rummy in power. But that was 5 years ago. Typically, you need a change in leadership every 3-5 years in important positions because of how draining they are and you constantly need new energy at the top. This occurs in political posts as well as in the private sector.
"If those in the chain of command disregarded weather reports and sent ill-eqipped soliders into the fray, then how is it not their fault? They should be punished, absolutely."
I was referring to the intensity of the storm, which was obviously not their fault.
I know that there is a reason that Bush put Rummy in power. But that was 5 years ago. Typically, you need a change in leadership every 3-5 years in important positions because of how draining they are and you constantly need new energy at the top. This occurs in political posts as well as in the private sector.
"If those in the chain of command disregarded weather reports and sent ill-eqipped soliders into the fray, then how is it not their fault? They should be punished, absolutely."
I was referring to the intensity of the storm, which was obviously not their fault.
2020.10.10酒店賣假酒 獲取不法所得!不敢來酒店上班-酒店打工的原因?竹聯幫寶和會行事風格凶狠，不只捲入館長槍擊案，這次酒店小姐的基本介紹跟工作內容還被檢舉涉嫌販賣假酒，上個月新北市刑大與財政局菸酒查緝隊前往酒店業者所經營的，香閣里拉酒店、維多利亞酒店、百達妃麗酒店、百家妃麗酒店、百富妃麗酒店，兵分六路各帶回洋酒檢驗，這次跟著逮捕行動二度前往，當場扣走上百箱的酒，只是這突如其來的【酒店小姐】【酒店公關】酒店上班到底都在做麼?行動，讓酒店業者跟酒店酒店小姐酒店上班措手不及，無奈配合調查。包廂內原本還在狂歡，霹靂小組突然衝進裏頭喊卡，酒店小姐酒店兼差不是一個複雜的工作環境？，穿著火辣，但這回也不是查人也不是查毒品，而是桌上的假酒。酒店門口堆滿整箱的酒，警方不只站在門外守著，裡面還有查緝隊人員逐一清點。這頭點完還沒結束，另外一個角落也同樣放了另外一個牌子的洋酒。數量多到根本放不下，連忙呼叫轄區中山分局員警支援，上個月新北刑大與台北市財政局菸酒查緝隊進行第一次搜索，當場把可疑的假酒帶回送驗，確認有異狀後，這次二度查扣，上百箱的可疑假酒全被帶回。知情人士：「比較流行就大摩，再來就是，譬如說這個XR蘇格登也很多，還有類似皇家禮炮這種，大概就是幾千元上下，不會去仿路易十三那種，因為銷不好。」檢警人員調查，近來接獲檢舉在台北市中山區酒店有業者竟然拿出假酒販售，從中牟取暴利。常見假酒分為兩種，一款是偽造酒瓶、紙盒和標籤，內裝食用酒精和香料；另外一種惡劣廠商，將回收來的酒瓶重新整理，裝入劣質原料再售出，與原廠售出價格落差3到5倍，常見的以蘇格登、XR還有大摩，而涉案的還是竹聯幫和堂寶和會。知情人士：「其實他們做的比較廣，就是說當然還是以立威為主嘛，主要是不管，只要是有利益或有知名度的賭場或百家樂啊，都有加減涉入啦。」寶和會近年來竄起，以中山、大安為據點，作風剽悍，還曾捲入立院旁槍擊案，寶和會不僅插旗酒店、夜店還經營地下錢莊，成員較年輕，利用凶狠行徑出名後，還會鎖定知名人士替寶和會立威，這次涉嫌教唆砸下重金對館長開槍，與寶和會作風接近，恐怕也脫不了關係。
提供酒店打工
簡單的工作內容，將休閒娛樂變成能賺錢，不需經驗學歷
自由的彈性排班，配合自身的時間狀況彈性安排酒店上班
應徵對象
酒店應徵外型面貌姣好年滿１８的女性
服務對象：政商名流．企業老闆
薪資收入基本4小時6000起跳
酒店工作內容陪吃飯．參加PARTY．陪同應酬談生意限制條件
飯局小姐外型門檻較高請親洽面談
飯局女孩工作簡單高薪又輕鬆
工作內容：保持親切笑容，維持良好互動。如:唱唱歌、聊聊天、倒酒小酌、桌面清潔。
酒店兼差時間：營業時間為下午三點至翌日凌晨六點，自選時段上班6~7小時即可，任選二至五天報班。
優渥薪資
時薪800-1000元外加小費，平均月薪10萬以上
兼職一週約領15000~25000元以上
正職一週約領25000~50000元以上
酒店面試:酒店公關、酒店小姐
酒店工作
內容
便服店，禮服店，制服店
唱歌，聊天，玩遊戲，整理桌面，有互動。
酒店公關時間：營業時間下午2：00開始至凌晨7：00，可任選時段。
每天7H為主，可兼職。
酒店薪資部份周領，日領，小費自取月入十萬以上。因人而異喔！
【舒壓會館】
早晚班美容師，無經驗可
工作時間：中午12：00~凌晨5：00
時段任選薪優可日領
聊天小姐
口齒清晰，態度親切，無經驗可
工作時間：中午12：00~晚上7：00
時薪1000元~1300元，每天現領。
【優質女神】
工作內容
保持親切笑容,維持良好互動
如：唱唱歌~聊聊天~倒酒小酌~桌面清潔
上班時間營業時間：晚上10點至隔日早上10點（任選8小時即可）
依本身狀況報班,週休2-4天
量身訂做般的出勤,絶不影響原本的生活
優渥薪資
平均月薪10萬以上
兼職一週約領15000-25000以上
正職一週約領25000-50000以上
八大職缺-種類與坐檯內容(酒店/紓壓會館)
：
「禮服酒店」:
禮服店較適合無經驗的新人，而且沒有秀舞。
穿著以緞面、合身、開領、無袖的短禮服為佳。
工作內容以包廂氣氛熱絡為主，強調與客人間的互動，如唱歌、喝酒、桌面服務等(我們有專文提到)。
商務客層約占6~7成。不像便服店的條件要求相對較高，也沒有便服店「拚框」的競爭壓力。
「便服酒店」:
便服店的商務客更多，所以公關們都非常自律，會用心投資自己與經營客人，也是各方面要求最高的酒店類型，除了體態、臉蛋高標準外，也講求談吐與手腕，公關彼此競爭激烈，生存難度相對較高，而坐檯模式與禮服店相同。
「制服酒店」:
制服店的消費客層較年輕也多元化，各式各樣的客人都有。
在制服店雖然不需要亮麗的外表，但公關們妝感比較濃厚，制服以性感兩截式爲主，包廂服務強調主動與炒熱氣氛，客人作風比較親切、直接。
「紓壓會館」:
與酒店不同的是，舒壓會館都是「一對一」在包廂內幫客人按摩。
因特有「預約制」，所以每位「舒療師」會培養自己的特色來增加客源。
另一優點是【不用喝酒、上班時段彈性、早班客源充足】等，在上班20天的情況下，不包括小費，基本薪資大約都在15萬以上。
服裝儀容
專業設計師打造彩妝、美髮造型，著風格時尚禮服。
簡單的工作內容，將休閒娛樂變成能賺錢，不需經驗學歷
自由的彈性排班，配合自身的時間狀況彈性安排酒店上班
應徵對象
酒店應徵外型面貌姣好年滿１８的女性
服務對象：政商名流．企業老闆
薪資收入基本4小時6000起跳
酒店工作內容陪吃飯．參加PARTY．陪同應酬談生意限制條件
飯局小姐外型門檻較高請親洽面談
飯局女孩工作簡單高薪又輕鬆
工作內容：保持親切笑容，維持良好互動。如:唱唱歌、聊聊天、倒酒小酌、桌面清潔。
酒店兼差時間：營業時間為下午三點至翌日凌晨六點，自選時段上班6~7小時即可，任選二至五天報班。
優渥薪資
時薪800-1000元外加小費，平均月薪10萬以上
兼職一週約領15000~25000元以上
正職一週約領25000~50000元以上
酒店面試:酒店公關、酒店小姐
酒店工作
內容
便服店，禮服店，制服店
唱歌，聊天，玩遊戲，整理桌面，有互動。
酒店公關時間：營業時間下午2：00開始至凌晨7：00，可任選時段。
每天7H為主，可兼職。
酒店薪資部份周領，日領，小費自取月入十萬以上。因人而異喔！
【舒壓會館】
早晚班美容師，無經驗可
工作時間：中午12：00~凌晨5：00
時段任選薪優可日領
聊天小姐
口齒清晰，態度親切，無經驗可
工作時間：中午12：00~晚上7：00
時薪1000元~1300元，每天現領。
【優質女神】
工作內容
保持親切笑容,維持良好互動
如：唱唱歌~聊聊天~倒酒小酌~桌面清潔
上班時間營業時間：晚上10點至隔日早上10點（任選8小時即可）
依本身狀況報班,週休2-4天
量身訂做般的出勤,絶不影響原本的生活
優渥薪資
平均月薪10萬以上
兼職一週約領15000-25000以上
正職一週約領25000-50000以上
八大職缺-種類與坐檯內容(酒店/紓壓會館)
：
「禮服酒店」:
禮服店較適合無經驗的新人，而且沒有秀舞。
穿著以緞面、合身、開領、無袖的短禮服為佳。
工作內容以包廂氣氛熱絡為主，強調與客人間的互動，如唱歌、喝酒、桌面服務等(我們有專文提到)。
商務客層約占6~7成。不像便服店的條件要求相對較高，也沒有便服店「拚框」的競爭壓力。
「便服酒店」:
便服店的商務客更多，所以公關們都非常自律，會用心投資自己與經營客人，也是各方面要求最高的酒店類型，除了體態、臉蛋高標準外，也講求談吐與手腕，公關彼此競爭激烈，生存難度相對較高，而坐檯模式與禮服店相同。
「制服酒店」:
制服店的消費客層較年輕也多元化，各式各樣的客人都有。
在制服店雖然不需要亮麗的外表，但公關們妝感比較濃厚，制服以性感兩截式爲主，包廂服務強調主動與炒熱氣氛，客人作風比較親切、直接。
「紓壓會館」:
與酒店不同的是，舒壓會館都是「一對一」在包廂內幫客人按摩。
因特有「預約制」，所以每位「舒療師」會培養自己的特色來增加客源。
另一優點是【不用喝酒、上班時段彈性、早班客源充足】等，在上班20天的情況下，不包括小費，基本薪資大約都在15萬以上。
服裝儀容
專業設計師打造彩妝、美髮造型，著風格時尚禮服。
台北市中山區林森北路一棟大樓，昨天（24日）晚間9時許發生砍人事件。兩派酒店經紀公司因搶酒店小姐問題相約談判，過程中一言不和爆發衝突，混亂中，一名34歲的酒店工作廖姓男子遭砍，當場血流如注，警消獲報趕抵，趕緊將其送醫，所幸沒有生命危險，警方循監視器通知涉案的7人到案，依妨害秩序、傷害罪嫌偵辦。據了解，周姓主嫌和陳姓酒店經紀負責人，先前也曾因為協調酒店公關間的跳槽合約問題，鬧的不太開心，昨（24）日是二度因為這事，相約見面。周姓主嫌帶著6名同黨到林森北路的經紀公司，雙方才講沒幾句、就爆發衝突，一群人拿出棍棒狂毆，還亮出刀子朝陳姓酒店經紀負責人朋友身上揮砍，導致他手臂遭劃傷。，因酒店小姐合約問題相約談判，雙方人馬共9人一碰面，才談沒幾句就爆發口角，進而演變衝突，混亂中，廖男遭人持西瓜刀砍傷左手臂濺血，傷人一方見狀隨即一哄而散。警消獲報趕抵，發現酒店工作廖男左手臂受有刀傷，立即將其包紮後，送往醫院救治，所幸沒有生命危險。警方調查，廖男旗下的1名酒店小姐，與另家經紀公司的周姓男子（27歲）為好友，女方私下抱怨在廖男旗下待遇不好，酒店環境又差，希望轉換經紀公司，周男則在前陣子就找廖男等人談過此事，但沒有共識。昨天周男又率領其他酒店兼職黑道幫派6人前往廖男的公司，雙方沒談幾句就發生衝突，周男一派共有7人，還拿西瓜刀將廖男砍傷，隨即逃離現場，警方調閱監視器，鎖定周等7人，陸續在今天凌晨通知到案，並依法移送。
有關於【酒店合約/簽約】的問題!知名律師兼北市檢察官做一次總解答讓妳們解決心中的困惑。
1:已現在酒店上班酒店打工沒有所謂的簽合約/切結書，因為這樣是綁小姐的做法，很不道德…【酒店上班小姐總有一天會離開，強求她留在八大這是不人道的行為】
2:在職人員想更換經紀人或酒店不想做了…卻有合約在身怎麼辦~…!?律師事務所表示直接跟你說可以馬上離開了
a : 酒店應徵合約內容本身要件要有【商營利事業登記編號/還有政府認證核發蓋章】因為這些文件都是要繳稅的….一但登報稅了，您自己想想 妳在酒店兼差職期間這幾年{妳}家人~早就會知道你在八大行業了…..反而家人卻沒發現，每年也都沒有繳稅單更沒有勞健保，因為這份是假合約【法律用語:偽造文書】
b :合約內容常有一段話:幾年以內不能離職/幾年內不能更換經紀人。這番話已經觸犯【法律用語:強制罪】
c :從一開始的違法合約到內容的不人道，甚至離職還又要賠償..。知名檢察官跟妳說【妳被唬了】
d :重頭到尾觸法的假合約，真的到警察局/法院 {妳}是贏家。
e :檢察事務所表示快十五年了…我還沒見過有經紀公司拿著合約去警局敢賭這件事。
Post a Comment
有關於【酒店合約/簽約】的問題!知名律師兼北市檢察官做一次總解答讓妳們解決心中的困惑。
1:已現在酒店上班酒店打工沒有所謂的簽合約/切結書，因為這樣是綁小姐的做法，很不道德…【酒店上班小姐總有一天會離開，強求她留在八大這是不人道的行為】
2:在職人員想更換經紀人或酒店不想做了…卻有合約在身怎麼辦~…!?律師事務所表示直接跟你說可以馬上離開了
a : 酒店應徵合約內容本身要件要有【商營利事業登記編號/還有政府認證核發蓋章】因為這些文件都是要繳稅的….一但登報稅了，您自己想想 妳在酒店兼差職期間這幾年{妳}家人~早就會知道你在八大行業了…..反而家人卻沒發現，每年也都沒有繳稅單更沒有勞健保，因為這份是假合約【法律用語:偽造文書】
b :合約內容常有一段話:幾年以內不能離職/幾年內不能更換經紀人。這番話已經觸犯【法律用語:強制罪】
c :從一開始的違法合約到內容的不人道，甚至離職還又要賠償..。知名檢察官跟妳說【妳被唬了】
d :重頭到尾觸法的假合約，真的到警察局/法院 {妳}是贏家。
e :檢察事務所表示快十五年了…我還沒見過有經紀公司拿著合約去警局敢賭這件事。
<< Home
